I’ve received a flurry of e-mails the past few days, many with a common theme concerning Iowa’s search for a new basketball coach. I’ll share them and add a response or two along the way…
From Jose Ponce, Davenport: “I was born in Iowa City and have been a huge Iowa fan all my life. I’ve followed their sports programs for as long as I can remember. I have a couple of questions that maybe you can answer. My first question of course is about the coaching vacancy for our basketball team. Bruce Pearl has always been on the minds of hopefuls but does that seem very realistic? He seems to be very happy where he’s at and with a weak SEC conference, he will always be able to compete for recruits and championships in the South. Another SEC school, Vanderbilt, is a strong team and funny, as I’m writing this, they lost at the buzzer to Murray State but their coach Kevin Stallings has been rumored to be a candidate. How realistic is that?”
Only Pearl and Stallings probably know how realistic their interest in an opening at Iowa would be. I can tell you that Iowa spoke with both in 2007 after Steve Alford left for New Mexico. Pearl quickly expressed no interest at that time and Stallings did interview for the position and turned down a $1.4 million offer from Iowa. Would either be interested now? It’s hard to say but neither would come cheaply and that will likely be a factor. Times and situations do change and that may have an impact on how interested they are in the Iowa job this time around. With a young group of returning players, a solid recruiting class and a $43 million practice facility under construction, it’s an attractive job. — Steve
From Jim Turnbough, Iowa City: “Your poll for who should be the next Hawkeye coach doesn’t have B.J. Armstrong. He would get my vote if on the list.”
B.J. Would be an interesting candidate. He was a part of the search committee when Todd Lickliter was hired and has expressed an interest to help out in that capacity again. With his ties at the professional level and in scouting talent, he is a valuable asset to have onboard. My guess is that Iowa will be seeking someone with coaching experience at this point, something B.J. does not have. — Steve
From Eduardo Ricaurte, Bettendorf: “What about Stan Joplin as a head coach for Iowa. He was an assistant under Tom Izzo at Michigan State and was the head coach at Toledo University. I think he would be a good fit at Iowa.”
There’s a name that I haven’t heard bounced around yet. Stan has been out of coaching since he was fired after a 12-year run at Toledo in 2008. Given that Toledo is looking for a head coach again, maybe things weren’t so bad for the Rockets when Stan was around. He does have Michigan State experience, spending five years as an assistant under Jud Heathcote and one under Tom Izzo before taking the Toledo job. Stan did interview for a few coaching jobs a year ago, but hasn’t landed anything yet. Interesting suggestion. — Steve
From Linda Dudgeon, Bettendorf: “We’ve owned season football tickets since the ’70s. The tickets are very pricey and the school forces us to give an additiional amount in the hundreds in order to keep those tickets. I want to know if some that money is going to Lickliter to satisfy his contract and since the AD picked Lickliter and has now fired him, maybe some of that dispersment should come out of the ADs pocket. I liked Lickliter and I don’t think he was given ample time especially with the unfortunate leaving of many team members not related to coach. Thanks.”
I doubt that any of those $2.4 million dollars are coming out of Gary Barta’s pocket. The Iowa athletic department is self supporting. It receives no state funds. Money to pay off Lickliter’s contract will come from dollars generated by the department to operate its $63 million annual budget. Those dollars come from three primary sources and each provides the department with roughly one-third of its income. Ticket sales, fund-raising efforts and revenue from TV and radio rights each account for about one-third of the funds. The dollars to pay off Lickliter’s contract, as well as whatever it takes to pay for a new coach, will come from a combination of those sources. — Steve
From C in Bettendorf: “Is Steve Lavin a possible candidate?”
Lavin’s name pops up from time to time when openings come up. He’s a good, solid basketball coach. Former Keady assistant at Purdue and head coach at UCLA. A lot of times television commentators find it preferrable to coach everybody else’s teams with their words and then move on to the next assignment than to commit to a return to the bench. — Steve
From Bruce D. Beasley from Clinton: “Like Whoopie Goldberg’s character said in Sister Act, we need to put some “butts in the seats.” Whoever they hire needs to run a Ralph Miller/Tom Davis up-tempo style of basketball. I would rather win, but if you lose no one wants to slow, boring basketball. Keno Davis isn’t quite ready for the Iowa job. … but how about his dad for an encore?”
With the weather starting to warm up a bit, I suspect Tom Davis is probably thinking more about a return to the golf course than he is a return to the bench. I’m not sure anybody is running a Ralph Miller-type system anymore. You don’t see too many teams averaging 104 points in conference play these days. I do agree with your point that up-tempo basketball is entertaining to watch and both Miller and Davis had some teams that could really push the pace. I don’t mind a half-court game, though, either and the Big Ten today is more in that style. When it’s run well as it is at places like Wisconsin it’s easy on the eyes. When the consistency in execution isn’t there, as has been the case at Iowa, it isn’t pretty. Those things tend to be cyclical and currently, the rules of the game may favor the defense more than the offense. — Steve
From Judy Patsch in Rock Island: “What about Scott Drew? He brought Baylor up from the ashes of scandal to a No. 3 seed this year. Since he grew up in the Midwest (dad Homer the longtime Valpo coach), maybe he’d like to return to the area.”
Scott would be an interesting candidate. He’s done a lot at Baylor and while the dollars there don’t compare to the resources available at a Texas or an Oklahoma, it is an institution with sufficient funding to keep him happy. A few Big 12 coaches have had some less than complimentary things to say about Scott’s recruiting practices, but he’s worth a big-picture look. I would think because of his Indiana roots that a Big Ten job would have some appeal. — Steve
Thanks for your e-mails and I’ll share more as they come in.
Steve